Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PorcE cannot provide good quality Orc level backtraces #216

Open
arthurp opened this issue Oct 10, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

PorcE cannot provide good quality Orc level backtraces #216

arthurp opened this issue Oct 10, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@arthurp
Copy link
Member

arthurp commented Oct 10, 2017

The current PorcE code semantically correctly handles exception, however the print out does not include an Orc backtrace (only the Java stack trace, which is displayed in place of the Orc trace).

PorcE has much of the information needed for this. However, some of it will need to be extracted from the Truffle stack which is someone complex. An intermediate step could be just including only the call site from Orc. This would be much easier.

@arthurp
Copy link
Member Author

arthurp commented Mar 26, 2018

This commit is partially addressed in 2dee4d6. However the traces are very bad due to optimization and lack of information from scheduled calls. Some more work will be needed to provide optional good quality stack traces.

@arthurp arthurp changed the title PorcE does not wrap exception and add Orc level backtraces PorcE cannot provide good quality Orc level backtraces Mar 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant