You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue has been created as an action following the Developer Call on Jan 18 2022.
In a discussion about #1999 and silently changing the L-M optimizer in Bumps the question arose as to how much traceability information should be contained in, or linked from, the SasView Report.
For example, the Report currently identifies the versions of SasView & Sasmodels, and the optimizer used, but does not identify the version of Bumps. See, for example: 504rc1_testing_fit_report.pdf
Should it? Or is Bumps 'just another' dependency that we don't need to specifically highlight? Or should the Report somehow link to the new dependencies work that @Caddy-Jones had started (but which is currently not working: #1987).
EnhancementFeature requests and/or general improvementsReportsConcerns report functionality
1 participant
Converted from issue
This discussion was converted from issue #2008 on October 30, 2022 20:20.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
This issue has been created as an action following the Developer Call on Jan 18 2022.
In a discussion about #1999 and silently changing the L-M optimizer in Bumps the question arose as to how much traceability information should be contained in, or linked from, the SasView Report.
For example, the Report currently identifies the versions of SasView & Sasmodels, and the optimizer used, but does not identify the version of Bumps. See, for example:
504rc1_testing_fit_report.pdf
Should it? Or is Bumps 'just another' dependency that we don't need to specifically highlight? Or should the Report somehow link to the new dependencies work that @Caddy-Jones had started (but which is currently not working: #1987).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions