-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ingress only mode provides incorrect apex #57
Comments
I think this should already be possible. |
the subdomain gets appended, e.g.
just returns |
ah right, I see, you want it to honour the final dot and not append a subdomain in that case, yeah? |
but then where would you create an A record for |
In the end I've just manually added some stuff to my corefile which seems to get the job done
|
this is neat! I like solutions that don't involve any code changes. |
In this case, I just wanted to have a separate zone for loadbalancer and ingress resources, e.g. |
So incidentally I recently also had to do something similar for handling a cluster that was mostly but not entirely accessed via Ingress resources. Also, an override pattern like this would be currently necessary if you want a count of nameservers that is >2. In that vein, here is an example of what I had to do, leveraging (abusing?) the template's provision for zone plugins.
|
In ingress-only mode, the apex record cannot be self-referential as
e.g.
exdns-1-k8s-gateway.kube-system.subdomain.example.com
won't be a valid record on this NS as this NS is only serving ingress resources.can I suggest that we make it possible to fully override the apex/secondary values by putting a domain with a . at the end...
and then A records can be created that actually point to this ingress-only deployment?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: