You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The editor-perspectives.dita file has a number of sub topics on the various views in the editor perspective. Currently all of those sub-topics are profiled eclipse only (and have eclipse screenshots). Only one topic, results-view.dita is unprofiled. editor-perspectives.dita is also unprofiled, which means that in the standalone documentation, results view is the only subtopic.
I see that anonymous has commented on this in the online docs. It is not clear to me if this is a profiling error or a missing content error.
In any case, I have profiled results-view.dita to exclude it from the AuthorSDK and SVNClient docs, as this was causing validation errors due to unresolvable links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The "editor-perspective.dita" is so heavily profiled inside that it could probably be split in two topics, one for standalone (editor, author, developer) and one for eclipse (editor, author, developer). The same for "results-view.dita".
Also the "editor-perspective.dita" should contain links to the available views like Outline, Project, Attributes, Entities which are documented in some other topics.
But we've got both an "outliner-view.dita" which seems to be documented both for standalone and eclipse and an "outline-view.dita" which seems to have been created specifically for eclipse.
I'm not completely sure how this particular situation should be handled though.
The editor-perspectives.dita file has a number of sub topics on the various views in the editor perspective. Currently all of those sub-topics are profiled eclipse only (and have eclipse screenshots). Only one topic, results-view.dita is unprofiled. editor-perspectives.dita is also unprofiled, which means that in the standalone documentation, results view is the only subtopic.
http://www.oxygenxml.com/doc/ug-editor/#topics/editor-perspective.html
I see that anonymous has commented on this in the online docs. It is not clear to me if this is a profiling error or a missing content error.
In any case, I have profiled results-view.dita to exclude it from the AuthorSDK and SVNClient docs, as this was causing validation errors due to unresolvable links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: