-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Timeline bars of OAP are to long #87
Comments
You use the wrong start date!!!!! |
when logging the start dates to the console, it showed that most date object represented some day at 2pm. that might be one reason why the work packages are too short. |
The WPs are 1 Day... |
A workaround for the strange timeline behavior can be found in the iss87_testing_workaround branch (https://github.com/paffman/WBS-Project/tree/iss87_testing_workaround) inside This workaround is very limited though. Its expecting you to only use hole numbers for the BAC of any work package (4.5, 7.6..., are not working correctly). So a project might look like this: One Day is shown from 12:01 am to 11:59 pm. This is only done for displaying the work packages on the timeline. The dates of the actual work packages are not changed. All the work packages have a BAC of 1 and are correctly represented on the timeline. March 1st ist a Saturday and March 2nd a Sunday, which is the reason for the gap. There is still one problem though with the first work package (1.1.0.0 - Teil 1). Its BAC is 1, the start date is Feb 25 but calculated release is Feb 26. When I created the project it was Feb 25 in the evening, so maybe the tool knows that the next work day is Feb 26 and therefore the work package should be completed at that date. But it is ignoring this fact for the calculation of the start date for some reason. |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: