PyO3: introduce PyComparedBool type to simplify __richcmp__ methods
#21687
+169
−195
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tdyas
added
category:internal
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduce a
PyComparedBooltype with three variants (True,False, andNotImplemented) to simplify the boilerplate currently present in most of the__richcmp__dunder methods.PyComparedBoolis convertible fromOption<bool>so a__richcmp__method can easily return PythonTrue/Falsewhen a comparison is supported orNotImplementedjust by building anOption<bool>and calling.into().