From 61f1253342901fdb14bddc6acd7c354d628f19d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Venhoek Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 11:48:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix images in report --- validation/24-11-2023-boundary-clock/report.md | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/validation/24-11-2023-boundary-clock/report.md b/validation/24-11-2023-boundary-clock/report.md index 19b1ad6f8..2f9f8f1fd 100644 --- a/validation/24-11-2023-boundary-clock/report.md +++ b/validation/24-11-2023-boundary-clock/report.md @@ -22,11 +22,13 @@ For this data we then calculated both the mean and the sample standard deviation ## Results -![plot of offset to grand master clock for direct connection](i210-direct-offset.png) +![plot of offset to grand master clock for direct connection](i210-direct-offset.png?raw=true) + The above shows the offset of the clock of the i210 when synchronized directly to the grandmaster. This has a sample standard deviation of $1.4$ microseconds, though the sawtooth means it is not at all normally distributed. -![plot of offset to grand master clock for connection via boundary](i210-bc-offset.png) +![plot of offset to grand master clock for connection via boundary](i210-bc-offset.png?raw=true) + This shows the offset of the clock of the i210 when synchronized via a boundary clock. This has a sample standard deviation of $1.6$ microseconds. Note that the sawtooth here is quite a bit faster than in the direct synchronization case. ## Conclusions