You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is important to do as without this clarification the copyright of the code is very fragmented and the authorship of each function / line of code / file rests with the developer who wrote it.
Reading CRAN Extensions on licensing, we can see that we should avoid something like "Name-of-package authors".
Also, the authors should be indicated in decreasing order of contribution. Given the current state of contributions to the package I'd like to suggest:
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Pattern Institute
Atorus Research LLC
Transition Technologies Science sp. z o.o.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We forgot to update the Apache License with the copyright holders (at the end of the file):
sdtm.oak/LICENSE.md
Line 182 in 453926b
This is important to do as without this clarification the copyright of the code is very fragmented and the authorship of each function / line of code / file rests with the developer who wrote it.
Reading CRAN Extensions on licensing, we can see that we should avoid something like "Name-of-package authors".
Also, the authors should be indicated in decreasing order of contribution. Given the current state of contributions to the package I'd like to suggest:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: