Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

NOTE: We should probably not emit empty statements. It does not change the semantics of the program but it's weird and might not look like "correct" code. #892

Open
guillep opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

NOTE: We should probably not emit empty statements. It does not change the semantics of the program but it's weird and might not look like "correct" code. #892

guillep opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@guillep
Copy link
Member

guillep commented Jan 6, 2025 

          NOTE: We should probably not emit empty statements. It does not change the semantics of the program but it's weird and might not look like "correct" code.

OTOH: I would also argue for using nonstandard-but-widely-supported extensions like expression statements instead of trying to force sequence points on an expression by use of the comma operator.

Originally posted by @iglosiggio in #891 (comment)
@guillep
Copy link
Member Author

guillep commented Jan 6, 2025

Good issue for @RenaudFondeur

@iglosiggio iglosiggio mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@guillep