You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We already have C++11 as a requirement. Some aspects, which are currently implemented via Boost, could now be replaced. For instance:
Random number generators
boost::tuple
boost::bind
boost::function
For now, I would avoid upgrading to C++14 unless there is a significant need. However, starting to gradually migrate straightforward parts (currently implemented with Boost) to C++11 should simplify the maintenance in the long run.
From what I see, it would eliminate the need for Boost. Although a dependency to Boost is not really harmful, we should avoid it if all functionality that we are using comes now with C++11.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(issue migrated from grogers0/CppQuickCheck)
We already have C++11 as a requirement. Some aspects, which are currently implemented via Boost, could now be replaced. For instance:
For now, I would avoid upgrading to C++14 unless there is a significant need. However, starting to gradually migrate straightforward parts (currently implemented with Boost) to C++11 should simplify the maintenance in the long run.
From what I see, it would eliminate the need for Boost. Although a dependency to Boost is not really harmful, we should avoid it if all functionality that we are using comes now with C++11.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: