Skip to content

Log4j 1.x vulnerability #442

Answered by pietermartin
JU-Chang asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Sqlg does not use JMSSink so no it is not affected by this vulnerability.

Replies: 2 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by JU-Chang
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@JU-Chang
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants