You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Google Contacts allows a "RELATIONSHIP" field for a contact, which can be used to identify spouses, parents and children. Upon syncing with a vdir repository, these appear in the vcard as:
It doesn't seem that the google contacts interface allows to input another vcard id like in the former, but only a text field like in the latter. vdirsyncer could however convert the item1.X-AB*** fields to the standard RELATED one ?
At the moment, khard doesn't seem to use the RELATED fields (see lucc/khard#273) but maybe other clients can.
Your vdirsyncer version 0.16.7
If applicable, which server software (and which version) you're using google contacts
Your Python version 3.8.6
Your operating system Ubuntu 20.10
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looks like google generates a vcard entry that doesn't use the standard RELATED;TYPE field, but their own custom field instead. The real fix would be for Google to use the standard fields, but we all know how Google dislikes following standards.
I don't think it's a good idea to convert those. When syncing back to Google, you'd replace their custom entry with a standard one, which likely won't show up on their UI (can you try and see if RELATED;TYPE does show up on their UI?).
While it's possible to keep track of custom redefined fields, that's way out-of-scope for vdirsyncer, and sounds like a pain to maintain.
Google Contacts allows a "RELATIONSHIP" field for a contact, which can be used to identify spouses, parents and children. Upon syncing with a vdir repository, these appear in the vcard as:
whereas, according to the RFC, it should be something like:
It doesn't seem that the google contacts interface allows to input another vcard id like in the former, but only a text field like in the latter. vdirsyncer could however convert the item1.X-AB*** fields to the standard RELATED one ?
At the moment, khard doesn't seem to use the RELATED fields (see lucc/khard#273) but maybe other clients can.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: