You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
consider that the block is in the future and does not have a timestamp yet until the block exists
could do a @deriveFrom of block, however we do not know the "id" of the block until the future, perhaps we can change block.id to use number instead of id (hash), this would allow us to reference blocks in the past and whenever the blocks appear in the future, they would be linked.
Need to consider being able to query SoftwareUpgradeProposal when the future block of upgrade_at does not yet exists
MintScan includes a timestamp for upgrade at
@deriveFrom
of block, however we do not know the "id" of the block until the future, perhaps we can changeblock.id
to use number instead ofid
(hash), this would allow us to reference blocks in the past and whenever the blocks appear in the future, they would be linked.SoftwareUpgradeProposal
when the future block ofupgrade_at
does not yet existshttps://www.mintscan.io/cosmos/proposals/924
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: