Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update various defaults to not reflect HPE convention #44

Open
jens-markussen opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Update various defaults to not reflect HPE convention #44

jens-markussen opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jens-markussen
Copy link
Contributor

jens-markussen commented Oct 8, 2024

Currently HPE conventions remain in a few places, e.g. splitting issues by severity as defined by e.g. S1 - High format. Similarly for issue type format, e.g. T1 - Defect. While this naming standard is certainly very good, it is specific.

Better to come up with something more generic and have that be standard. Issue types could be bug, documentation,enhancement,question ideally prepended with type - .

Some of the standard processing labels could also be taken into account. E.g. duplicate,good first issue,invalid,help wanted,invalid. They could have some sort of modified prefix, e,g. mod - , but this is perhaps not strictly necessary.

Then there should be a set of priority and/or severity of labels, similar to S1 - High....

One suggestion is to keep all labels lower case (allowing digits and symbols of course).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant