Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced guide for deploying and hosting scripts #5414

Open
5 tasks
Jwaegebaert opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 6 comments
Open
5 tasks

Enhanced guide for deploying and hosting scripts #5414

Jwaegebaert opened this issue Aug 24, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@Jwaegebaert
Copy link
Contributor

Jwaegebaert commented Aug 24, 2023

The concept involves introducing an additional segment within the category User Guide in the docs. This new segment would provide a comprehensive manual that dives deeper into the process of how individuals utilizing the CLI can deploy and host their scripts. This could be more effective through an example that walks through the steps of deploying a script onto a specific service or integrating the CLI into particular frameworks. Some potential subjects we could start with:

@Jwaegebaert Jwaegebaert added docs needs peer review Needs second pair of eyes to review the spec or PR epic labels Aug 24, 2023
@milanholemans
Copy link
Contributor

Yes we definitely need good guidance!

@Adam-it
Copy link
Member

Adam-it commented Sep 5, 2023

  • using CLI on Android 🤔😉

Good idea. Let's not forget more docs means more work to keep it up to date 😉. Maybe we should have some scheduled event (every 2nd month) to review if the manuals/docs/wikis we have are still 'fresh'.
It's okay when a blog post goes out of sync, but for docs we should have an eye out for the changes

@milanholemans
Copy link
Contributor

@Jwaegebaert what is the further action here? Should we create sub-issues so people can pick them up?

@Jwaegebaert
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jwaegebaert what is the further action here? Should we create sub-issues so people can pick them up?

I think that will be best. Those won't be the simplest to work out all together.

Good one to bring this issue to light again!

@milanholemans milanholemans removed the needs peer review Needs second pair of eyes to review the spec or PR label Feb 26, 2024
@Adam-it
Copy link
Member

Adam-it commented Mar 5, 2024

ok. I'll take on the Azure DevOps guide

@Jwaegebaert, @milanholemans what about Gitlab? should we add a guide for that as well?
@pnp/cli-for-microsoft-365-maintainers any comments on this?
For now, we were very focused on GitHub workflows only and currently, we are extending the support with Azure DevOps (adding guide, adding a command to generate flow, researching how to create ADO dedicated pipeline tasks etc.)
What if we slowly expand to other DevOps environments and go with GitLab next and start with a guide?

@milanholemans
Copy link
Contributor

I think GitLab is a nice-to-have, GitHub and DevOps have a higher priority imo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants