Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support DanglingLineAction in OperatorStrategies #863

Open
jeandemanged opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support DanglingLineAction in OperatorStrategies #863

jeandemanged opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member

Describe the current behavior

On powsybl-core actions API side, we can define DanglingLineAction-s (since https://github.com/powsybl/powsybl-core/releases/tag/v6.3.0, see powsybl/powsybl-core#2903), but no python bindings are provided.

Describe the expected behavior

Python bindings are available to define DanglingLineAction-s

Describe the motivation

e.g. simulate HVDC actions where the HVDC link is not modelled explicitly but through an unpaired dangling line.

Extra Information

requested on Slack #pypowsybl channel on Oct 14th 2024

See also powsybl/powsybl-open-loadflow#1102 for OLF support of DanglingLineAction-s
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
Release 03/2025
Status: TODO
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jeandemanged