Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support TerminalsConnectionAction in OperatorStrategies #864

Open
jeandemanged opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support TerminalsConnectionAction in OperatorStrategies #864

jeandemanged opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jeandemanged
Copy link
Member

Describe the current behavior

On powsybl-core actions API side, we can define TerminalsConnectionAction-s (since https://github.com/powsybl/powsybl-core/releases/tag/v6.2.0, see powsybl/powsybl-core#2843), but no python bindings are provided.

Describe the expected behavior

Python bindings are available to define TerminalsConnectionAction-s

Describe the motivation

e.g. in case of bus branch model is used and there is no switches

Extra Information

requested on Slack #pypowsybl channel on Oct 14th 2024

TerminalsConnectionAction is supported today by OLF

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: TODO
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant