You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is fine in many cases, but can lead to issues in cases where the rgh part changes in the domain.
As a workaround, you can for now manually change p to p_rgh in your simulations, if needed.
Edit: This is only important in buoyant and multiphase solvers that account for hydrostatic pressure effects. These solvers compute everything based on p_rgh and p is only a derived quantity for them, which may lead to strange issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As discussed in https://precice.discourse.group/t/multiphase-fsi-case-with-the-openfoam-adapter/1163/3, the force computation for compressible solvers seems to be using the
p
field.This is fine in many cases, but can lead to issues in cases where the
rgh
part changes in the domain.As a workaround, you can for now manually change
p
top_rgh
in your simulations, if needed.Edit: This is only important in buoyant and multiphase solvers that account for hydrostatic pressure effects. These solvers compute everything based on
p_rgh
andp
is only a derived quantity for them, which may lead to strange issues.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: