You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are currently exploring migration from origin enrollment to site enrollment for the Aggregation Service (current form using origin here) for the following reasons:
Ease of onboarding for adtechs, so they don't have to enroll each origin individually
As a follow up to this proposal, we would like to support multiple origins in a batch of aggregatable reports. Do adtechs have a preference or blocking concern with either specifying a list of origins or the site in the createJob request?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Note that adtechs will still be able to determine which origins are processed and consume budget based on valid origins included in their reports for each batch. Specifying the site or a list of origins in createJob is more for usability/validation and does not change this functionality.
As a quick update, we have now launched site enrollment for Aggregation Service.
As part of this launch, we have updated our aggregation service onboarding form to use the site (ex: https://adtech.com) instead of origin (ex: https://analytics.adtech.com/ ) for enrollment. This creates consistency with the enrollment for the client API and streamlines onboarding by allowing adtechs to enroll multiple origins of the same domain as one site.
Adtechs should ensure the site used for new aggregation service enrollments is the same site used for the client API enrollment. They should also ensure they are using the correct URL format for their reporting origin (ie, ensure the https:// prefix is included in the origin) to avoid errors.
There is no action needed for prior enrollments. AWS accounts/GCP projects already mapped to previously enrolled origins will be updated to map to the applicable site.
Note that this change does not include batching of multiple origins for the same site in a single job; the createJob API still supports only one origin per job. However, we are actively working on this proposal as mentioned in my earlier post and will update our status page once we have more information on this and other features.
Hi all!
We are currently exploring migration from origin enrollment to site enrollment for the Aggregation Service (current form using origin here) for the following reasons:
As a follow up to this proposal, we would like to support multiple origins in a batch of aggregatable reports. Do adtechs have a preference or blocking concern with either specifying a list of origins or the site in the createJob request?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: