You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should define at least one required metric/policy for the standard. This is required to be interested op if a second router vendor will implement dmpr and will communicate with us.
Remember, metric name must not start with underscore for standardized protocol, vendor specific and experimental extension metrics must start with underscore.
So to rephrase my initial wordings: we must define at least one path metric/policy in the ID and give them a unique name.
Probably a example or two should be given: highest-bandwidth, highest-bandwidth-no-costs (one with filter)
ietf-drafts/draft-pfeifer-rtgwg-dmpr/draft-pfeifer-rtgwg-dmpr-00.txt
Lines 152 to 157 in b5f4e5b
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: