You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's no 2.5S branch so I can only report this bug there.
After the MK2.5 to 2.5S upgrade the print size was reduced by 5mm on the origin size (not possible to go to position x=0).
This is a physical constrain of this design, the endstop-block part enforces this distance on the origin side and reducing the endstop-block will only allow for 2-3mm more until the cables become a problem.
At the moment this issue is made worse by the fact that slicer doesn't account for this problem so any prints that try to use the full size (250mm) will fail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Old issue yes, but thought this could be useful input from what I have discovered on my own: Even with an Einsy board, without the endstops or endstop block, you will still have trouble on the 2.5S branch with getting the full size due to the cable bundle and unique cable holder of the 2.5 branch. I assume the unique cable holder was needed due to the frame differences between the MK2 and MK3 frames but i've not been able to confirm the frame differences, just assumptions as I don't have a MK3 to compare to. The MK3 cable holder is leaps and bounds ahead of the MK25S holder but it constricts the X axis size even further unfortunately.
There's no 2.5S branch so I can only report this bug there.
After the MK2.5 to 2.5S upgrade the print size was reduced by 5mm on the origin size (not possible to go to position x=0).
This is a physical constrain of this design, the endstop-block part enforces this distance on the origin side and reducing the endstop-block will only allow for 2-3mm more until the cables become a problem.
Please see: https://forum.prusaprinters.org/forum/original-prusa-i3-mk2.5s-mk2.5-hardware-firmware-and-software-help/cant-print-below-x5-ish-print-truncated/#post-179382
for more details and information on this issue?
At the moment this issue is made worse by the fact that slicer doesn't account for this problem so any prints that try to use the full size (250mm) will fail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: