Pulling in community updates

[pshassett]

Thanks for keeping this alive and up-to-date with the progress of WNTR.

[pshassett]

No objections to most of these changes.

[pshassett]

@jhogge
@jckettepa

I see that the tests haven't been passing.
I propose making a new branch here to pull in the updates and we can collaboratively get the tests to pass.
Thoughts?

[jhogge]

@pshassett
We are generally seeing differences in the third significant figure on the tests ever since the WNTR 0.3.0 update, so I'm thinking there was a change to the WNTRSimulator that slightly modified the testing results. I think @jckettepa has looked into WNTR vs. EPANET simulator results?

[pshassett]

@jhogge thanks for the quick response. I suppose the benchmark values just need to be updated then.
I am seeing some package version issues coming up on my tests for this particular PR.

[jckett]

Hi all, yes we are seeing minor changes between WNTR and EPANET simulator. Additionally, with the change of WNTR incorporating EPANET 2.2, we have gotten slightly different pressure results for the criticality runs since @pshassett ran them. The recent PR only changes the segment indexing so I'm not sure why this specific PR would show errors for you but the November one did not. I re-cloned @jhogge's repo today and pushed the index change.