Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create or enhance a feature in Figgy's edit scanned resource form to trigger an identifier as to whether Digital Content is whole or a portion of the whole in UI for applications #6465

Open
1 of 3 tasks
kelea99 opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@kelea99
Copy link
Contributor

kelea99 commented Jul 18, 2024

Summary (discussed with @ccleeton and @faithc )

As a PULFAlight, Orangelight, or DPUL user, I need a way to easily determine whether or not the digitized content available is the whole item (entire component ID or MMS ID) or a portion of the whole. If it is unclear to me whether a portion or the whole of an item is digitized, I may make a trip to Princeton University Library that is unnecessary (if items are already fully available online) or I may believe that the portion that is digitized is the extent that princeton holds.

As a figgy user responsible for the ingest/bulk ingest and/or review of items being added to the repository, I need to a way to easily mark whether an item is a portion or a whole in the edit form of the item. I will still need a free text field like that which currently exists as "Portion Note", to add further information. However, whatever triggers the portion/whole determination in the UI will need to adhere to a not-yet-existing best practice for the vocabulary used.

Other tickets

See also: PULFAlight repo #1371 ; PULFAlight repo #1372 ; figgy repo #6292

Impact

Please include hard deadlines, if the exhibit is part of an event, the issue is stopping work, etc.
There are no hard deadlines, nor is the issue stopping work, but this conversation has taken place with multiple staff members, including Special Collections Public Services staff, who have shared user feedback regarding this confusion and the digital studio has shared its feedback regarding confusion as to whether an item in the repository is a portion or the whole, before photography and digitization.

Priority recommendation

  • asap
  • within the next 3 weeks
  • PO will prioritize - MULE for next work cycle?

Sudden Priority Justification

Required if "asap" or "within the next 3 weeks" is checked. Add "Sudden Priority" and "Maintenance/Research" labels

Expected behaviour

Actual behaviour

Steps to reproduce behaviour

Screenshots

@kelea99 kelea99 added the mule label Jul 18, 2024
@tpendragon
Copy link
Contributor

Who's gonna click the checkbox?

@kelea99
Copy link
Contributor Author

kelea99 commented Jul 18, 2024

figgy Ingesters or figgy users reviewing the items before completion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants