We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Edit screens should display a manner that is easy to use and populate.
Visit paper edit screen: https://repec-prod.princeton.edu/econlib/RePEc/pri/papers/4/edit Visit series edit : https://repec-prod.princeton.edu/econlib/RePEc/pri/series/2/edit
The sites work but they don't look good. The abstract field on the paper form is particularly bad.
I think this was a regression after the LUX upgrade.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Expected behavior
Edit screens should display a manner that is easy to use and populate.
Actual behavior
Steps to replicate
Visit paper edit screen: https://repec-prod.princeton.edu/econlib/RePEc/pri/papers/4/edit
Visit series edit : https://repec-prod.princeton.edu/econlib/RePEc/pri/series/2/edit
Impact of this bug
The sites work but they don't look good. The abstract field on the paper form is particularly bad.
Acceptance criteria
Implementation notes, if any
I think this was a regression after the LUX upgrade.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: