You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In unlikely scenarios, the extension could get stuck open until there is a request sent from the router on each open channel, allowing the subsequent re-request to get a 409
These scenarios, while infrequent, could be very costly
Acceptance Criteria
Add support to the Extension for a status code that indicates "call me again"
This could be 204 No Content which would trigger the next request loop
Do not send this status code from the router until supported by the extension
When there are other users, this sort of change would need to have the Extension identify that it supports a particular feature when it connects - This can be done by setting a features header on the router channel request
Consider support to the Router for a 103 Early Hint with a Lambda-Dispatch-Control header that can ask for closing
Consider extracting the /api/chunked/close request into a location where it can be independently invoked on errors
This should attempt to establish a new connection for the request
If the connection fails, the channels should exit after:
A lengthy (20-30 seconds) timeout if there are requests in flight, unless the count drops to zero
A short (5 seconds) timeout if there are no requests in flight and no requests arrive during that timeout
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Motivations
Acceptance Criteria
204 No Content
which would trigger the next request loopLambda-Dispatch-Control
header that can ask for closing/api/chunked/close
request into a location where it can be independently invoked on errorsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: