You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Given some representation of a set of DAGs, we want to reduce this to one DAG. For example, given a collection of DAGs, or some graph posterior, construct a DAG.
Describe the solution you'd like
Input: A matrix of the probability of edge presence, and the probability of edge direction given presence
Output: A DAG.
Algo:
Construct an undirected based on matrix 1 and a threshold.
Construct a directed graph based on matrix 2 and a threshold.
Remove edges based on some heuristic:
Removes or reverses as few edges as possible
Minimizes probabilistic loss (e.g. reverse X->Y is bad if it has a 99% chance of being true, but not so bad if it has a 50% chance of being true
Might need to work with only one matrix (the product of the two matrices I described). Many algorithms return such a matrix as output, especially those that use variational inference.
In my proposed approach a collection of graphs would be rendered into matrices. It might make sense to derive a consensus graph from a list of graphs directly. For example, one might try to preserve colliders across graphs in the collection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Given some representation of a set of DAGs, we want to reduce this to one DAG. For example, given a collection of DAGs, or some graph posterior, construct a DAG.
Describe the solution you'd like
Input: A matrix of the probability of edge presence, and the probability of edge direction given presence
Output: A DAG.
Algo:
Describe alternatives you've considered
https://rdrr.io/cran/bnlearn/src/R/averaged.network.R
Might need to work with only one matrix (the product of the two matrices I described). Many algorithms return such a matrix as output, especially those that use variational inference.
In my proposed approach a collection of graphs would be rendered into matrices. It might make sense to derive a consensus graph from a list of graphs directly. For example, one might try to preserve colliders across graphs in the collection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: