You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current code uses a try-except block to handle a potential KeyError when looking up a color value in the COLORS_BY_VALUE dictionary:
try:
returnCOLORS_BY_VALUE[rgb]
exceptKeyErrorase:
iffallback:
returnself.as_hex()
else:
raiseValueError('no named color found, use fallback=True, as_hex() or as_rgb()') frome
Proposed Change:
Refactor the code to use an if-else conditional check instead of a try-except block. This change improves code readability and leverages a more predictable conditional flow:
ifrgbinCOLORS_BY_VALUE:
returnCOLORS_BY_VALUE[rgb]
else:
iffallback:
returnself.as_hex()
else:
raiseValueError('no named color found, use fallback=True, as_hex() or as_rgb()')
Benefits:
Enhances code readability by removing the exception handling for a simple key lookup.
Clearly separates the logic for handling the presence and absence of the key in the dictionary.
Impact:
This change is expected to maintain the existing functionality while improving code clarity.
Please let me know if there are any specific tests or cases you would like me to address in this refactoring.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description:
Current Implementation:
https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-extra-types/blob/main/pydantic_extra_types/color.py#L109
The current code uses a
try-except
block to handle a potentialKeyError
when looking up a color value in theCOLORS_BY_VALUE
dictionary:Proposed Change:
Refactor the code to use an
if-else
conditional check instead of atry-except
block. This change improves code readability and leverages a more predictable conditional flow:Benefits:
Impact:
This change is expected to maintain the existing functionality while improving code clarity.
Please let me know if there are any specific tests or cases you would like me to address in this refactoring.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: