Alternative to setup.py build_ext
#3388
-
Hi, With commands of the form This question seems like something that might be covered/addressed somewhere, though I checked the docs and a number of other sources but couldn't find anything. Apologies in advance if I have missed something. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Hi @codeandfire, thank you very much for thoroughly exploring the docs and bringing attention to some points that might be problematic. It really helps. I don't a replacement for "partial" commands is planned (i.e. commands that just build part of the distribution). Users can run I think that running If there is a compelling use case we probably would need to discuss it more deeply (as far as I understand the general desire here would be that setuptools stop concerning about having to provide a CLI utility). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @codeandfire, thank you very much for thoroughly exploring the docs and bringing attention to some points that might be problematic. It really helps.
I don't a replacement for "partial" commands is planned (i.e. commands that just build part of the distribution). Users can run
python -m build --wheel
to compile the entire wheel without passing through the sdist, but there is nothing currently planned to just build the extensions without the rest of the package.I think that running
pip install -e .
might have as a side effect compiling the extensions "in-place" and leaving the binary files available under the working directory.If there is a compelling use case we probably would need t…