-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
offset function in the formula #82
Comments
We don't have any plans for this, but open source contributions are welcome! |
I'd be interested in support for this as well. I may take a look at implementing it if I can find the time in the next few weeks. |
I wrote a lot of the code in this repository. I'm no longer actively working on this, but I'm still following the issues. Feel free to ask me about anything I've done that doesn't make sense. Good luck! |
@null-a Thanks! I haven't yet had time to think through how to implement w.r.t. this code base. If there has been any thoughts or discussions on how to support I'd be interested to hear. Otherwise, I'll be sure to ask if I run into any questions. |
I'm not aware of any previous discussion. (And don't even recall what As a starting point, here's a rough high-level sketch of how we go from the inputs of formula, dataset and description of custom priors we get from the user, to either Pyro/NumPyro code.
(The items in back-ticks denote Python classes.) My guess would be that each stage of this pipeline would need to be updated to handle offsets. i.e. Update the parser to parse out offsets and represent them in |
I am wondering if the team has plan to develop offset function? What is the expecting timeline for this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: