feat/ add changelog generation and version update #615
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@SafetyQuincyF has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates, including a new version entry for 3.2.9 in the changelog, which documents various changes such as deprecation messages, new features, and fixes. A new script for automating version management is added, which includes functions for reading, incrementing, and updating version numbers and changelog entries. The version number in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)
8-17: Consider standardizing commit reference formatThe entries have inconsistent formats for referencing PRs and commit hashes. Some entries include PR numbers while others don't. Consider standardizing the format across all entries.
Example format to follow:
feat: add feature description (#PR) (commit-hash) fix: fix description (#PR) (commit-hash) chore: chore description (#PR) (commit-hash)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
8-17: Consider adding changelog generation guidelinesSince this PR introduces changelog generation, consider adding a section at the top of the file that describes:
- The changelog generation process
- The expected format for different types of entries
- Guidelines for writing clear and consistent entries
This will help maintain consistency in future entries.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- safety/VERSION (1 hunks)
- scripts/release_scripts/increment_version.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- safety/VERSION
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
🪛 Ruff
scripts/release_scripts/increment_version.py
52-52: Redefinition of unused
refrom line 2Remove definition:
re(F811)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
8-8: Verify version number and dateThe version number (3.2.9) and date (2024-10-23) align with the PR objectives. However, please ensure this is the correct version increment according to your versioning strategy, as this appears to be a mix of features, fixes, and chores.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the changes in this PR to better understand if this version increment is appropriate.
Based on the changelog entries, I can now generate a final response about the version increment.
Version increment 3.2.9 is appropriate
The version increment from 3.2.8 to 3.2.9 follows semantic versioning principles correctly:
- The changes include a mix of features (PR template, devcontainers support), fixes (safety error, internal server error), and chores (deprecation messages)
- Since these are backwards-compatible additions and fixes, a patch version increment (3.2.8 → 3.2.9) is appropriate
- The chronological order and date (2024-10-23) are also consistent with the previous release (3.2.8 from 2024-09-27)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if this is the correct version increment echo "Checking previous version..." rg -B 1 "## \[3\.2\.[0-9]+\]" CHANGELOG.mdLength of output: 388
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the changes included in this version echo "Checking changes in version 3.2.9..." rg "## \[3\.2\.9\]" -A 20 CHANGELOG.md # Check package.json version echo -e "\nChecking package.json version..." rg '"version":\s*"[^"]+"' package.jsonLength of output: 1366
SafetyQuincyF
force-pushed
the
feat/add-changelog-generation
branch
4 times, most recently
from
0636b13 to
7da6fd6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
scripts/release_scripts/increment_version.py (1)
1-147: Consider adding configuration managementThe script would benefit from better configuration management to make it more maintainable and reusable:
- Extract hardcoded values (file paths, commit types) to a configuration file
- Add command-line arguments for configuration file path
- Consider supporting different version file formats and locations
- Add support for different changelog formats
This would make the script more flexible and easier to maintain across different projects.
CHANGELOG.md (2)
11-12: Inconsistent indentation in changelog entriesThe entry on line 12 has extra spaces before "devcontainer". Maintain consistent indentation across all entries.
-fix: devcontainer fix (be42d8e) +fix: devcontainer fix (be42d8e)
8-17: Consider adding a brief summary section for version 3.2.9Following the pattern seen in version 3.0.0 and other major releases, consider adding a brief summary section that highlights the key changes in this version. This helps users quickly understand the significance of the update.
## [3.2.9] - 2024-10-23 +### Summary +This release includes several improvements including deprecation messages, devcontainer support, and various fixes for authentication and server-related issues. +🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
tests/test_cli.py (1)
536-536: Fix indentation to maintain consistency.The indentation on this line appears to be inconsistent with the rest of the file.
- expected_output_snippet = f"{get_safety_version()} scanning" + expected_output_snippet = f"{get_safety_version()} scanning"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- safety/VERSION (1 hunks)
- scripts/release_scripts/increment_version.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_cli.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- safety/VERSION
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CHANGELOG.md
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
scripts/release_scripts/increment_version.py (1)
146-147: LGTM!The entry point follows standard Python practices.
CHANGELOG.md (4)
8-8: LGTM: Version header follows the Keep a Changelog formatThe version header follows the correct format
## [3.2.9] - 2024-10-23as specified by Keep a Changelog.
9-9: Fix typo in deprecation message entryThe word "deprection" is misspelled in the changelog entry.
15-15: Improve clarity of vulnerability-related entryThe entry contains redundant text and unclear phrasing.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~15-~15: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...) - fix: clarify-vulnerabilities-found/ Fixed the issue where the vulnerabilities (07...(FIX_RESOLVE)
17-17: Inconsistent feature entry formatThe entry format is inconsistent with other entries. It uses "feature:" instead of "feat:" and includes additional text after the colon.
tests/test_cli.py (2)
21-21: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed.The addition of
get_safety_versionto the existing import fromsafety.utilis well-organized and follows the module's import structure.
536-537: LGTM: Test now uses dynamic version checking.The change improves maintainability by replacing hardcoded version with a dynamic version check using
get_safety_version(). The assertion provides clear error messages with detailed output.
SafetyQuincyF
force-pushed
the
feat/add-changelog-generation
branch
2 times, most recently
from
643c38a to
c8d8850
Compare
SafetyQuincyF
force-pushed
the
feat/add-changelog-generation
branch
from
c8d8850 to
4d26574
Compare
SafetyQuincyF
changed the title
Description
Adds the changelog and version update
Type of Change
Checklist
used like:
python scripts/increment_version.py minor