You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From Evan: It is still almost impossible for reviewers to assess the validity of a code list, unless a major code is missing. Which is where this repository might again help. Especially if counts for unique codes (i.e. X patients uniquely identified with code) are included in the uploaded files. Say you missed a code that doesn’t do anything vs you missed a big one.
It will be a very useful feature if we churn out overall patient counts for each code (which I did in the past in Stata) and unique patient counts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From Evan: It is still almost impossible for reviewers to assess the
validity of a code list, unless a major code is missing. Which is where
this repository might again help. Especially if counts for unique codes
(i.e. X patients uniquely identified with code) are included in the
uploaded files. Say you missed a code that doesn't do anything vs you
missed a big one.
It will be a very useful feature if we churn out overall patient counts
for each code (which I did in the past in Stata) and unique patient counts.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12
.
From Evan: It is still almost impossible for reviewers to assess the
validity of a code list, unless a major code is missing. Which is where
this repository might again help. Especially if counts for unique codes
(i.e. X patients uniquely identified with code) are included in the
uploaded files. Say you missed a code that doesn't do anything vs you
missed a big one.
It will be a very useful feature if we churn out overall patient counts
for each code (which I did in the past in Stata) and unique patient counts.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/12
.
From Evan: It is still almost impossible for reviewers to assess the validity of a code list, unless a major code is missing. Which is where this repository might again help. Especially if counts for unique codes (i.e. X patients uniquely identified with code) are included in the uploaded files. Say you missed a code that doesn’t do anything vs you missed a big one.
It will be a very useful feature if we churn out overall patient counts for each code (which I did in the past in Stata) and unique patient counts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: