You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello team.
I'm trying to find a way to define federation upstream set with messaging-topology-operator.
In RabbitMQ, we can set federation-upstream-set to refer to it in a federation policy definition that repeatedly listing upstreams.
I can't see any example or description in CRD though.
Is there any way to set federation-upstream-set to be used for federation policy? or, is there any good way to define federation policy for multiple federation upstream?
The reason why i'm looking for the way is - I have multiple federation that has same pattern with different uri (federation upstreams) and used one policy with federation-upstream-set so that, multiple federation links can run with same policy (same pattern)
Wondering if it's not supported feature in messaging-topology-operator yet. If so, anyone have thought/experience how to set same policy on multiple upstream federations with messaging-topology-operator?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello team.
I'm trying to find a way to define federation upstream set with messaging-topology-operator.
In RabbitMQ, we can set federation-upstream-set to refer to it in a federation policy definition that repeatedly listing upstreams.
I can't see any example or description in CRD though.
Is there any way to set federation-upstream-set to be used for federation policy? or, is there any good way to define federation policy for multiple federation upstream?
The reason why i'm looking for the way is - I have multiple federation that has same pattern with different uri (federation upstreams) and used one policy with
federation-upstream-set
so that, multiple federation links can run with same policy (same pattern)Wondering if it's not supported feature in messaging-topology-operator yet. If so, anyone have thought/experience how to set same policy on multiple upstream federations with messaging-topology-operator?
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions