You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
RADICAL Pilot provides some API documentation in terms of radical.utils entities. The lack of online radical.utils API documentation causes holes in the radical.pilot documentation. In some cases, this is addressed by effectively duplicating some documentation in radical.pilot, which presents a maintainability problem.
Some common examples
ru.Url
ru.Config
ru.Logger
ru.Reporter
In general, web documentation could (or should) be derived from new or existing docstrings. It may be overly noisy to use the Sphinx auto-api-doc script to generate complete package documentation, especially since module docstrings are frequently missing and the docstrings have not been normalized to be parsed cleanly. Given that the current rtd site is nearly empty, a small hand-curated subset of API elements would seem better than nothing.
@eirrgang volunteers to do a spot check of ru references in rp docstrings for an initial "Commonly used API features" section, if there is any interest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RADICAL Pilot provides some API documentation in terms of
radical.utils
entities. The lack of onlineradical.utils
API documentation causes holes in theradical.pilot
documentation. In some cases, this is addressed by effectively duplicating some documentation inradical.pilot
, which presents a maintainability problem.Some common examples
In general, web documentation could (or should) be derived from new or existing docstrings. It may be overly noisy to use the Sphinx auto-api-doc script to generate complete package documentation, especially since module docstrings are frequently missing and the docstrings have not been normalized to be parsed cleanly. Given that the current rtd site is nearly empty, a small hand-curated subset of API elements would seem better than nothing.
@eirrgang volunteers to do a spot check of
ru
references inrp
docstrings for an initial "Commonly used API features" section, if there is any interest.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: