Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2024. It is now read-only.

The way how examples are represented in RC2 is not fully compatible with definition system #35

Open
petrochenko-pavel-a opened this issue Apr 10, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

The way how examples are represented in RC2 is not fully compatible with definition system #35

petrochenko-pavel-a opened this issue Apr 10, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@petrochenko-pavel-a
Copy link
Contributor

I have implemented a workaround with using any as a type of example property, and plan to implement custom parsing for it in the parser, but this is not we want actually. So we need to deal with it somehow.
@sichvoge
Copy link
Contributor

What do you mean "is not fully compatible"?

@petrochenko-pavel-a
Copy link
Contributor Author

This means that we currently can not represent full set of example property options in definition system correctly.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sichvoge @petrochenko-pavel-a