You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, I love ngram type, and I've been using it for awhile now, but there is something that I think could help improve the words feature even more. Whenever you use the words feature, it doesn't give any importance (or at least not much) to adjacent words that have a higher frequency of occurrence whenever we use English. For example, whenever I choose a combination of 2 and a repetition of 1, uncommon or nonsensical combinations show up repeatedly, such as "a have" or "the be". This is a pretty big opportunity cost whenever you practice and could be fixed, but is exponentially costly the more words you explore, so a limit of the ten most commonly used words in English might be something to explore for this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, I love ngram type, and I've been using it for awhile now, but there is something that I think could help improve the words feature even more. Whenever you use the words feature, it doesn't give any importance (or at least not much) to adjacent words that have a higher frequency of occurrence whenever we use English. For example, whenever I choose a combination of 2 and a repetition of 1, uncommon or nonsensical combinations show up repeatedly, such as "a have" or "the be". This is a pretty big opportunity cost whenever you practice and could be fixed, but is exponentially costly the more words you explore, so a limit of the ten most commonly used words in English might be something to explore for this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: