Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider options to indicate location of EFG areas not visible on world view #30

Open
tmfrnz opened this issue Jul 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tmfrnz
Copy link
Collaborator

tmfrnz commented Jul 20, 2020

Some EFG areas are very small and not or hardly visible when zoomed out, i.e. when viewing the whole world.

Example EFGs are

To limit the risk of users missing this information, it would be good to consider options optionally indicate the locations of these small EFG areas

@tmfrnz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmfrnz commented Jul 20, 2020

Here a couple of options that come to mind:

  1. allow optionally specifying and multiple (rectangular) boxes that are overlaid (on low zoom levels) and could also offer a click-to-zoom function
    image
  2. allow optionally specifying an additional vector layer containing large enough buffers (could again offer a click-to-zoom function)
    image

both graphics are mock-ups only for illustrative purposes and do not reflect actual locations

The benefit of the 2nd options would be that the process of identifying these "areas of interest" could be automated

@tmfrnz tmfrnz added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 20, 2020
tmfrnz added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2020
@tmfrnz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmfrnz commented Nov 30, 2020

@sylvhay @jrfep suggest that these areas should not be shown when in Analyse? Otherwise we may want to consider using different colours.

image

@tmfrnz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tmfrnz commented Dec 2, 2020

@sylvhay removed these highlights in "Analyse" for now... but let me know if you prefer otherwise

@sylvhay
Copy link
Collaborator

sylvhay commented Dec 2, 2020

Thanks, that makes sense to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants