Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Whether or not to mention response bodies for error responses #134

Open
michielbdejong opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Whether or not to mention response bodies for error responses #134

michielbdejong opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Member

Continuation of 9f8a4e2
michielbdejong referenced this issue Nov 30, 2015
do not mention response bodies for errors, no point to have those for…
9f8a4e2 
… the storage API
@untitaker
Copy link
Member

I'd vote for removal, this best practice is universal, not specific to the remoteStorage specification, and therefore redundant there.

@michielbdejong
Copy link
Member Author

So we move it to implementation suggestions section, along with a substantial number of other paragraphs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@michielbdejong @untitaker