Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 12, 2020. It is now read-only.

Should the request timeout be named ttl or timeout #30

Open
thovid opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Should the request timeout be named ttl or timeout #30

thovid opened this issue Mar 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
discuss A raw concept that needs discussion whether it is a good addition. question Further information is requested

Comments

@thovid
Copy link
Member

thovid commented Mar 12, 2018

Picking up a discussion of the last pull-request: Apollo names the timeout for a request ttl. Should we stick to the Apollo naming (as done in the PR), or should we change this to timeout?
@thovid thovid added question Further information is requested discuss A raw concept that needs discussion whether it is a good addition. labels Mar 12, 2018
@thovid thovid mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2018
Merged
@thovid thovid changed the title Should the request timeout be named ttl or timeout Should the request timeout be named ttl or timeout Mar 13, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discuss A raw concept that needs discussion whether it is a good addition. question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@thovid