-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FPGA implementation #10
Comments
Hi there, |
Thank you for your dedication to optimizing the FPGA implementation. I understand the importance of ensuring performance and reliability. However, if possible, would you consider sharing the current version of the SystemVerilog code? Access to the work-in-progress could be incredibly beneficial for users like myself who are eager to learn from your approach and contribute to the project's development. Any level of access would be greatly appreciated, even if it's not the final version! |
Hi @ridgerchu , Also are there any plans to make it work on intel arria 10 series of fpga. we have a bunch of them used for some other purpose, would love to benchmark and contribute in that aspect if it will be supported |
Hello. I am managing the hardware implementation. Once we finish our optimizations and reorganizations, we will make the code available. We have several researchers at UCSC working on it, so it will be completed within the next couple months. We are designing the RTL to be functional across as many targets as possible. Our design and testbenches will hopefully work on open-source and commercial flows. As for the FPGA implementation itself, as was mentioned in the paper preprint, we are currently using the Intel D5005 with a Stratix 10 GX through DevCloud. |
Hello author, thank you very much for being able to open source your project, can you provide systemverilog code for FPGA implementation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: