-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A variation between the peak load for a typical day and hourly time-series peak load of the entire year. #27
Comments
Thanks for the bug report @adnanalakori, I will look at it when I have a moment! |
Dear @Bachibouzouk and @adnanalakori we observed the same issue. In our case we had 4 different yearly load profiles and in every case the peak value of the minute resolution is twice as high as the peak values of the hourly resolution |
@Bachibouzouk and @adnanalakori: What do you think about solving this via using the max() resampling instead of the mean() resampling for the hourly resolution? |
@a-linke - I agree with you that for peak demand it makes more sense to use |
One could do this by adding columns for each of these 5 numbers (so the csv would have the hourly timesteps, then 5 columns with those values) |
Make sense. Will try it and check the results. |
@a-linke and @Bachibouzouk, Yes, |
Ok so I will add the column to the output csv before I close the issue |
Dear @Bachibouzouk , there is a variation between the peak load for a typical day and other peak load of the hourly time series for the whole year for a fridge.
Peak load for a typical day is 3000W which is fine and fits the input load, while the peak load of the hourly time series generated for the whole year is only 410 W.
I have tested another load e.g. lamps and the results are fine.
input_file_1.xlsx
Attached an input file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: