For Reviewers

General Review criteria

• Does the code comply with general principles in the Mozilla reviewing guide?
• Are there improvements that could be made to the code style? ROpenSci packaging guide?
• Is there a lot of code duplication in the package?
• Are there user interface improvements that could be made?
• Are there performance improvements that could be made?
• Is the documentation (installation instructions/vignettes/examples/demos) clear and sufficient?

Also ensure that

• tests pass for you locally.
• vingettes and README examples run without issues.
• and last but not least, please be respectful and kind to the authors in your reviews.

Submitting the review

• Please strive to complete your review in a timely manner. Comments are welcome in the same issue as a package onboarding request. If your review comes as a series of issues, please submit those directly to the authors' repository and make a note in the review issue.