Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
You're right. The value is small. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
I'm interested in this too. Is there any advantage to using 'useCallback' instead of local functions? It seems int calculate(int value) => value + value; vs. final calculate = useCallback((int value) => value + value); |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm currently exploring the Flutter Hooks package and I am trying to understand the practical utility of the
useCallback
hook. I'd appreciate some insights or clarifications on my understanding.Context
In the React ecosystem,
useCallback
is often utilized alongsideReact.memo
for optimizing performance. It helps in avoiding unnecessary re-renders by retaining the callback function's instance, ensuring that the comparison of props remains consistent even across different renders.Concern
In the Flutter ecosystem, there isn't a direct equivalent of
React.memo
. Although we can use const constructors to minimize rebuilds, function objects can’t be constant. This implies that any widget receiving a function object as a property can’t be made const, thus undermining the potential benefits ofuseCallback
.Question
Is my understanding correct that
useCallback
might not offer significant benefits in Flutter, given the absence of a memoization mechanism akin toReact.memo
? I am eager to understand if there are specific scenarios or use cases whereuseCallback
proves beneficial in Flutter, that I might not be considering. Thanks.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions