From 76ecbbfc5be5e53f4203358b1fab261481d64ad0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niko Matsakis Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 17:48:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update src/membership.md --- src/membership.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/membership.md b/src/membership.md index 303e03b..1f994a5 100644 --- a/src/membership.md +++ b/src/membership.md @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ These are the questions we ask ourselves when deciding whether someone would be * This could have been by suggesting a compromise, but it may also be by asking the right questions or encouraging the right tone. * Is this person able to **disagree constructively and empathically**? * When they are having a debate, do they make an active effort to understand and repeat back others' points of view? - * Do they "steelman", looking for ways to restate others' points in the most convincing way? + * If they have a concern, do they engage actively to make sure it is understood and to look for ways to resolve it? * Do people come away from disagreements with this person feeling respected? * Is this person **active**? * Are they attending the [triage meeting](./meetings/triage.md) and [design meetings](./meetings/triage.md) regularly?