From 7b0a0685753a25e5b7434f33b3fe9b71afde8eed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niko Matsakis Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 12:14:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update src/membership.md Co-authored-by: Travis Cross --- src/membership.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/membership.md b/src/membership.md index da06ce9..2b3ae1f 100644 --- a/src/membership.md +++ b/src/membership.md @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ These are the questions we ask ourselves when deciding whether someone would be * Do they help turn disagreements into collaborations, jointly seeking a mutually satisfying solution based on everyone's values? * When they are having a debate, do they make an active effort to understand and repeat back others' points of view? * If they *or others* have a concern, do they engage actively to make sure it is understood and to look for ways to resolve it? - * Do people come away from disagreements with this person feeling respected, understood, and valued? + * Do they respect others when disagreeing, seek earnestly to understand others' points of view, and show that they value others for bringing forward reasonable disagreement and dissent? * Is this person **active**? * Are they attending the [triage meeting](./meetings/triage.md) and [design meetings](./meetings/triage.md) regularly? (Meetings are open for anyone to attend, but note that merely attending meetings is not enough to become a team member!) * Either in meeting or elsewhere, do they comment on disussions and otherwise?