From 7f39ca006bbad40f2c6a5dc6f8d3356cb0ad80d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Niko Matsakis Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 05:29:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update src/membership.md Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett --- src/membership.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/membership.md b/src/membership.md index cdc8a09..da06ce9 100644 --- a/src/membership.md +++ b/src/membership.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ These are the questions we ask ourselves when deciding whether someone would be * Is this person able to **lead others to a productive conversation**? * Are there times when a conversation was stalled out and this person was able to step in and get the design discussion back on track? * This could have been by suggesting a compromise, but it may also be by asking the right questions or encouraging the right tone. -* Is this person able to **disagree constructively and empathically**? +* Is this person able to **disagree collaboratively, constructively, and with empathy**? * The expectation is that team members go "above and beyond" the [Rust code of conduct](https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/code-of-conduct), embodying not only the letter but also the spirit. * Do they help turn disagreements into collaborations, jointly seeking a mutually satisfying solution based on everyone's values? * When they are having a debate, do they make an active effort to understand and repeat back others' points of view?