You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for releasing the code!
I noticed that in skip-thoughts/training/optim.py, the roles for beta1 and beta2 in the paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980.pdf) are replaced with 1-beta1 and 1-beta2 when updating the exp averages m_t and v_t, but not when computing the update lr_t. I have reproduced your model in Pytorch using the default Adam implementation and results are comparable. I suspect this is because (1-beta)^t and beta^t vanish exponentially so for large t, having replaced 1 - (1-beta)^t with 1 - beta^t will not change much. Do you have any other ideas why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for releasing the code!
I noticed that in skip-thoughts/training/optim.py, the roles for beta1 and beta2 in the paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980.pdf) are replaced with 1-beta1 and 1-beta2 when updating the exp averages m_t and v_t, but not when computing the update lr_t. I have reproduced your model in Pytorch using the default Adam implementation and results are comparable. I suspect this is because (1-beta)^t and beta^t vanish exponentially so for large t, having replaced 1 - (1-beta)^t with 1 - beta^t will not change much. Do you have any other ideas why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: