You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This repo is absolutely awesome, congrats on your work!
It absolutely saved my life
To be more precise, I have a private network were I deployed the safe contracts from gnosis, then I wanted to have a front and I tried to use safe-react from gnosis but I couldn't get it to work with my private network...
Now my question is: are you planning on adding contract interactions to the CLI ? (like on the picture)
This will be really usefull
Just an another suggestion: when creating a safe, you should add the option to create it even if the address who does the Tx doesn't have funds, because this test is irrelevant on a private network with a gasPrice null
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be more precise, I have a private network were I deployed the safe contracts from gnosis, then I wanted to have a front and I tried to use safe-react from gnosis but I couldn't get it to work with my private network...
Now my question is: are you planning on adding contract interactions to the CLI ? (like on the picture)
I would like to, but I still don't know how to do the interface on the CLI. You can also craft the data using an UI and use send_custom
you should add the option to create it even if the address who does the Tx doesn't have funds, because this test is irrelevant on a private network with a gasPrice null
This repo is absolutely awesome, congrats on your work!
It absolutely saved my life
To be more precise, I have a private network were I deployed the safe contracts from gnosis, then I wanted to have a front and I tried to use safe-react from gnosis but I couldn't get it to work with my private network...
Now my question is: are you planning on adding contract interactions to the CLI ? (like on the picture)
This will be really usefull
Just an another suggestion: when creating a safe, you should add the option to create it even if the address who does the Tx doesn't have funds, because this test is irrelevant on a private network with a gasPrice null
Cheers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: