Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Antonym Interlinking (kṛṣṇá vs. śveta) #4

Open
gasyoun opened this issue Dec 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Antonym Interlinking (kṛṣṇá vs. śveta) #4

gasyoun opened this issue Dec 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gasyoun
Copy link
Member

gasyoun commented Dec 22, 2019

kṛṣṇá in GRA contains (Gegens. śvetā́n). We could try to interlink the antonyms, because śveta is such. But it's śveta and not śvetā́n in the dictionary. Sp we should remove the accent and plural ending. Can we? Should we?

krsna

@drdhaval2785
Copy link

I do not think this requires work. Let us not link antonyms, which requires deciphering German singular / plural suffices.

@funderburkjim
Copy link
Contributor

Aside from the difficulty of interpreting German, etc. There is a more general feature that this request exemplifies: Interlinking of any sort.

Here is an example where a similar 'interlinking' might be considered.

There are in MW numerous <ab>id.</ab> references, and some sort of
interlinking would be useful here. There would be needed some sort markup indicating
the target. A glib possible such markup might be <ab ref="X">id.</ab>
or possibly <ref n="X"><ab>id.</ab></ref> where X is probably the SLP1 spelling of another headword.

One might do things in such a way that the Antoynym relinking could be handled in the
same way. Perhaps <ref n="Sveta">śvetā́n</ref>.

In either case,

  • X has to be determined, and
  • display programs need modification to do something useful when such markup is encountered.

@gasyoun
Copy link
Member Author

gasyoun commented Apr 7, 2021

X has to be determined

Let's start with MW? Links to <ab>id.</ab> or Panini are long wanting ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants