Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correction work based on #32 #33

Closed
funderburkjim opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Correction work based on #32 #33

funderburkjim opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@funderburkjim
Copy link

This issue documents several corrections to Benfey, based upon the specific suggestions noted in several comments of #32.

funderburkjim added a commit to sanskrit-lexicon/csl-orig that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2021
@funderburkjim
Copy link
Author

The files pertaining to the corrections are in https://github.com/sanskrit-lexicon/BEN/tree/master/2021-10-02.

Altogether, 180 lines in ben.txt are changed.
These may be reviewed via the csl-orig commit above, or by the change1.txt transactions.

ṣ -> sh

23 changes here. These agree with AB's list, except for Ghoṣā, siriṣa (changed to śirīṣa for consistency, a print change), and śirīṣa. Although these
are plant names, I don't think they are exactly Latin scientific names; hence, the diacritics are maintained. A small point,
probably debatable.

In the course of looking at word with an ṣ , several inconsistent spellings were changed, such as Kriṣṇa -> Kṛṣṇa.

[Pagê

These were changed to [Page10. Also, enclosing markup, such as {%...%} was removed, as being incosistent with
the convention for page break lines.

Bad pc numbers

These were caused by the [Pagê errors.
All the relevant metalines were changed, and now have accurate <pc> values.

2 bad scan errors

the niryUha error and the `{#Sa#} error were corrected.

funderburkjim added a commit to sanskrit-lexicon/csl-corrections that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant