Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

marketing #241

Open
danschumann opened this issue Sep 27, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

marketing #241

danschumann opened this issue Sep 27, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@danschumann
Copy link

Hey all, I'm glad to see that there is the same spark that died in coffeescript reignited here. Originally I'm sure they meant to continually reinvent conventions as to what is most efficient and readable, but since I've been to coffeescript, I've seen good, simple, obvious suggestions get shot down without explanation. That sort of unreasonableness has lead me here, and if I have to I'll start reading the code, but the average user will probably expect better and easier to work with docs and api explanation.

Is there a way to var coco = require('coco'); coco.compile(...) ? Probably, right? Where's the docs?

Most of the doc focus is on what's different.. but what's the same? Shouldn't this feel like a stand alone repo that can explain itself now that it's maturing? I know it's a free product but I feel like quite a bit of benefit could be done from quite a small amount of marketing. After all, I'm sure quite a bit of work goes into the code, so why not show it off?

@Delapouite
Copy link

@danschumann if you're looking for a more complete documentation, you may be interested by LiveScript which is an offspring of coco (and CoffeeScript obviously) : http://livescript.net

@vendethiel
Copy link
Contributor

I've seen good, simple, obvious suggestions get shot down without explanation

Where?

@vendethiel
Copy link
Contributor

Right. Refusing to back up your claims is definitely what fixes issues one encounters.

I'm not saying "you're lying, prove your point", I'm asking you where we could've done beter.

I am just about done using
coffeescript at all.

I don't get anything if more people use CoffeeScript. I havn't used it myself for almost two years, modulo stuff I do to to help on IRC. We're just volunteers. Sometimes we don't answer like we should, and that doesn't mean we don't want to try and fix it

@michaelficarra
Copy link
Contributor

@danschumann: As @Nami-Doc says, we're just volunteers legitimately trying to help people in their use of compile-to-JS languages. If we don't know what has been bothering you, we can't fix it. I suggest you be more patient in the future.

@vendethiel
Copy link
Contributor

@danschumann I'm sorry that's how you feel. But again, I can't change anything if I don't understand what's wrong. Every issue I close on coffee gets an explanation, usually a link to a duplicated ticket with explanations in that. Don't take it personally or think I'm dismissive, "sarcastic", etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants